Red RockMissile Base
← All entities

Federal Agency

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Also known as EPA

Connections

Entity connections

Connected projects

Synopsis

Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act requires EPA to designate areas after a new or revised National Ambient Air Quality Standard takes effect. States and eligible tribes submit recommendations, and EPA issues the final designations. The three outcomes are Attainment (often reported as attainment/unclassifiable) when an area meets or is cleaner than the standard, Nonattainment when it does not meet the standard, and Unclassifiable when EPA cannot determine the status from available information.

A designation is tied to a particular pollutant and standard; it is not a general certificate that an area has perfectly clean air. Boundaries may cover an entire county or only part of one. EPA's Green Book is the primary current source for nonattainment, maintenance, classification, map, and downloadable boundary information.

The designation affects the permitting path for new major stationary sources. In attainment areas, Prevention of Significant Deterioration review generally requires Best Available Control Technology, air-quality analysis, public participation, and protection of allowable air-quality increments. For a pollutant in a nonattainment area, nonattainment New Source Review requires Lowest Achievable Emission Rate controls, qualifying emissions offsets, and public involvement. Those different requirements can materially change the cost, timing, and feasibility of a proposed facility.

Public Concerns

  1. 1

    How the Clean Air Act Systematically Spoils Unspoiled Places

    The Clean Air Act inadvertently incentivizes the industrialization of our unspoiled places, with tens of millions in benefits per project in some industries.

    The sharp regulatory difference between attainment-area PSD review and nonattainment NSR creates a powerful siting advantage for cleaner rural places near metropolitan areas. It makes the landscapes, farms, habitats, views, and quiet communities most worth preserving financially attractive targets for major industrial development.

    What the law requires. Congress directed EPA to set health- and welfare-based national air-quality standards and designate every area after a standard is issued or revised. Governors and eligible tribes recommend boundaries and statuses; EPA makes the final designation. Each designation applies to a particular pollutant and standard, and its boundary can divide counties and municipalities.

    How the incentive works. A new major source in an attainment or unclassifiable area generally proceeds through Prevention of Significant Deterioration review. PSD is real regulation: it can require Best Available Control Technology, air-quality modeling and analysis, public participation, and proof that emissions will not violate the NAAQS or consume more than the applicable increment. But a major source proposed in a nonattainment area faces the more demanding nonattainment New Source Review path, including Lowest Achievable Emission Rate controls and emissions offsets.

    Why the difference is worth millions. EPA describes offsets as real emission reductions, generally obtained from existing nearby sources, that counter a proposed emissions increase and produce a net air-quality benefit. They are not a tax paid to EPA. They are scarce, difficult to assemble, and expensive, and required ratios can exceed one ton reduced for each ton added. Avoiding LAER and offset obligations can deliver tens of millions of dollars in comparative benefit on a single project in industries with large emissions profiles. The system therefore places a financial premium on building where the air is cleaner.

    The system spoils the unspoiled. Developers comparing sites see cleaner rural areas near transmission lines, pipelines, highways, water, and metropolitan demand as places where a major source can avoid the additional LAER-and-offset path. Those places often have smaller local governments, fewer technical specialists, and less money to evaluate applications than the corporations seeking approval. Revenue promises and compressed schedules deepen that imbalance. The regulatory structure does not merely fail to protect unspoiled places from this pressure; it creates the pressure.

    What people experience without seeing the mechanism. People in rural communities watch one industrial proposal after another take the peace, darkness, open views, farmland, habitat, and breathing room that drew them away from industrial conditions in the first place. They understandably struggle to explain why industry keeps targeting lovely remote places. The designation system’s hidden siting incentive supplies part of that answer: cleaner air is treated as cheaper industrial capacity.

    Why this contradicts the law’s purpose. The Clean Air Act exists to protect health and welfare, including visibility, crops, vegetation, animals, and buildings. A system serving that purpose should not sacrifice cleaner landscapes in sequence. An attainment designation cannot be allowed to function as an invitation to consume the very environmental quality the designation records.

    Local relevance. Marana crosses the Pima–Pinal county line. The portion of the tracked Tortolita Specific Plan Amendment at issue here lies in Marana’s Pinal County annexation. The nearby designation boundary makes the comparative permitting advantage visible. This does not establish why a particular applicant selected a particular parcel or what motivated an annexation; project-specific records must answer those questions. It does establish the structural incentive every applicant and public decision-maker operates within.

    What must change. EPA, Congress, states, and permitting authorities must confront and correct this incentive. Every major-source review should disclose how designation status affected site selection, compare already-industrialized alternatives, account for cumulative land and community loss, and apply location-neutral safeguards. Clean Air Act protections must remain strong without making attainment areas the industrial path of least resistance.

    Air-quality designation context

    Arizona reference map supplied for community context. Designations are pollutant- and standard-specific; use EPA’s live Green Book for current legal status and exact boundaries. This static image is not a legal boundary determination and may become outdated.
    National reference map supplied for context, illustrating how designated areas are concentrated around many metropolitan and industrial regions. Consult EPA’s live Green Book reports, maps, and downloads for current pollutant-specific designations.

    Supporting links

Timeline & Milestones

Project process not yet mapped. Required and voluntary milestones will appear here when this profile is completed.

How to get involved

Participation guides not yet published. Step-by-step ways to take part will appear here when this profile is completed.

Upcoming

No upcoming events currently posted.